Bolivar, diplomático y militar
In the face of this sort of theoretical diffusion, even a somewhat constricted and not entirely standard concept of cul¬ture, which is at least internally coherent and, more important, which has a definable argument to make is (as, to be fair, Kiuckhohn himself keenly realized) an improvement. Eclecticism is self-defeating not be¬cause there is only one direction in which it is useful to move, but be¬cause there are so many: it is necessary to choose.
The concept of culture I espouse, and whose utility the essays below attempt to demonstrate, is essentially a semiotic one. Believing, with Max Weber, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance, he himself has spun, I take culture to be those webs, and the analysis ol^ it to be therefore not an.experimental science in search of law but an in¬terpretive one in search of meaning. It is explication I am after, construing social expressions on their surface enigmatical. But this pro¬nouncement, a doctrine in a clause, demands itself some explication.
Operationalism as a methodological dogma never made much sense so far as the social sciences are concerned, and except for a few rather too well-swept corners—Skinnerian behaviorism, intelligence testing, and so on—it is largely dead now. But it had, for all that, an important point to make, which, however we may feel about trying to define cha¬risma or alienation in terms of operations, retains a certain force: if you want to understand